Hands reviewing financial documents and a calculator on a sunlit desk

Verity Application Cost Audit

Cost annexes examined before the funder sees them

We test the figures behind grant, subsidy, loan, and tender applications — wages, invoices, matching contributions, and the evidence that must travel with them.

Flagship review

Full Application Cost Audit

A line-by-line reading of the cost schedule attached to your application, written up as a findings memo your finance lead can act on before filing day.

Engagements usually run eight to fifteen working days. You send the annex and supporting packs; we return severity-ordered findings and, when asked, a corrected schedule draft.

Open the engagement brief
Reviewer comparing printed cost lines with supporting papers

Related reviews

Other ways we help before lodging

Shorter checks when the annex is nearly final, or when the hard part is organising the proof behind each line.

Calculator and printed financial documents arranged on a wooden table

From THB 22,000

Pre-Submission Cost Check

A shorter pass focused on the riskiest lines before you lodge — useful when the annex is nearly final and the deadline is close.

Read the brief
Organised folders and paperwork prepared for review

From THB 18,500

Evidence Pack Readiness

We organise and gap-check the invoices, contracts, and timesheets that sit behind your cost schedule so reviewers can follow the trail.

Read the brief
Two colleagues discussing documents during a meeting

From THB 16,000; rush fees apply under five business days

Clarification Response Support

When a funder or tender board queries your cost lines, we help you answer with evidence and revised figures that stay consistent with the original annex.

Read the brief
Bright office corridor suggesting calm professional review space

From the desk

Figures that survive a clarification round

Applicants come to us after a painful query letter — or to avoid one. We stay with the cost schedule, not the storytelling pages, so your numbers and evidence point the same direction.

Read client stories

Client notes

What people say after a review

“They caught three matching lines that reused the same volunteer hours. Reworking those pages delayed us by a week, which frustrated our programme lead, but the funder never asked about matching again.”

Niran P., finance officer for a coastal education charity

“The findings memo named the exact invoices missing for our subcontractor block. We knew what to collect overnight.”

Suda K., tender coordinator

“We used the pre-submission check on a short annex. Clear, specific, and paced to our lodging date.”

Marcus L., regional grant writer

Field notes

Recent guides

Notebooks and charts used while preparing a funding application

Matching contributions that hold up under a cost review

In-kind staff time and donated equipment look generous on paper — until a reviewer asks for timesheets and ownership proof.

Continue reading
Printed charts and a laptop on a desk during financial review

When overhead percentages invite funder queries

Flat overhead mark-ups are easy to type and hard to defend. Here is how we ask clients to document them.

Continue reading
Professional reviewing paperwork in a bright office

Building a cost annex from messy ledgers

Not every applicant keeps project codes. You can still assemble a credible schedule if you start from bank statements and contracts.

Continue reading

Bring the annex you are about to lodge

Tell us the funder type, page count, and deadline. We reply within two business days with availability and a fee range.

Request a review